Learning Curve
- id: 1735679449
- Date: Feb. 25, 2025, 3 p.m.
- Author: Donald F. Elger
Learning Curve (Logistic Function)
The learning curve describes how performance improves over time with practice. One common mathematical model for the learning curve is the logistic function, which captures how learning starts slow, accelerates, and then plateaus.
Logistic Function Formula
$$P(t) = \frac{L}{1 + e^{-k(t - t_0)}}$$
Where:
• P(t) is performance at time t .
• L is the maximum performance level (asymptote).
• k is the learning rate (how quickly improvement happens).
• t_0 is the inflection point (where learning is fastest).
• e is Euler’s number ().
The logistic function is given by:
Where:
is performance at time .
is the maximum performance level (asymptote).
is the learning rate (how quickly improvement happens).
is the inflection point (where learning is fastest).
is Euler’s number ().
Why It Matters
Explains Learning Growth: It shows why early progress is slow, followed by rapid improvement, and then a plateau.
Optimizes Training: Helps in structuring deliberate practice for efficiency.
Prevents Burnout: Recognizing plateaus avoids frustration and leads to better learning strategies.
Used in AI and Business: Machine learning, economics, and skill acquisition all follow similar patterns.
Why Learn About It?
- To Improve Your Own Learning
Recognizing plateaus can help you push through them with new strategies.
- To Optimize Teaching and Training
Educators and coaches can design lessons that match the natural phases of learning.
- To Understand Skill Acquisition
Mastery takes time, and understanding the curve prevents unrealistic expectations.
- To Apply It in Various Fields
AI & Neural Networks: Training models often follows a learning curve.
Business & Productivity: Employees improve over time in predictable ways.
Sports & Music: Skills develop through this natural progression.
Takeaway
Learning isn’t linear—it follows a curve. Understanding the logistic learning curve helps in planning, patience, and persistence to reach mastery.
Why Believe This?
The learning curve, particularly the logistic function model, is based on extensive empirical evidence across psychology, education, neuroscience, and industry. Here’s why you should believe in it.
- Experimental Evidence in Psychology & Education
- Ebbinghaus (1885): Memory and Forgetting Curves
Hermann Ebbinghaus, a pioneer in learning research, found that learning follows a predictable curve, where retention improves with repeated exposure but slows over time.
His experiments involved memorizing nonsense syllables and tracking recall over time, revealing a sigmoid (S-shaped) learning curve.
Thorndike’s Law of Practice (1898)
Edward Thorndike’s work on animal learning showed that performance improves with repeated practice but at a diminishing rate.
- Newell & Rosenbloom (1981): Power Law of Practice
Studied skill acquisition and found that performance follows a logarithmic curve—initial rapid improvement followed by slower gains.
- Neuroscience & Cognitive Science
Synaptic Plasticity:
Learning strengthens neural connections, but the rate of improvement decelerates as neural efficiency increases (Hebbian learning).
Studies of neuroplasticity confirm that early learning is slow, speeds up with practice, and then levels off.
Chunking & Skill Automation:
Cognitive studies (e.g., Chase & Simon, 1973, in chess) show that experts improve by recognizing patterns—a gradual process that follows a logistic curve.
- Industrial & Business Evidence
Wright’s Law (1936): Manufacturing Learning Curves
The aviation industry discovered that production efficiency improves predictably with experience.
This principle is used in cost reduction forecasting across industries.
Machine Learning & AI Training
Neural networks train according to a learning curve—initial slow improvement, rapid gains, then plateauing.
- Real-World Applications
Education: Curriculum designers structure learning in phases (e.g., Bloom’s Taxonomy).
Sports Training: Athletic improvement matches the S-curve, with diminishing returns.
Skill Mastery: From musical instruments to programming, improvement follows the same pattern.
Why Should You Believe It?
- Cross-Disciplinary Evidence:
- Findings are consistent across psychology, neuroscience, business, AI, and education.
- Predictive Power:
- The learning curve accurately predicts skill acquisition across domains.
- Observable in Everyday Life:
- Any skill you’ve mastered (e.g., biking, coding, playing an instrument) follows this pattern.
- Scientific Validation:
- Repeated experimental studies confirm its validity.
Bottom Line
The learning curve is not just a theory—it’s backed by over a century of experimental data. Whether in psychology, neuroscience, or business, it accurately describes how we learn and improve.